One question led to another.
What began as a question about protecting Springfield's groundwater became a much larger investigation into Manitoba's silica resources, alternative development pathways, processing, transportation, energy, Indigenous participation, value-added manufacturing and the long-term economic opportunity for Manitoba.
I kept following the evidence.
The result is The Missing Link — an independent research and policy discussion asking whether Manitoba should look beyond the debate surrounding a single project and examine the entire silica-to-manufacturing opportunity.
The Missing Link does not begin with the conclusion that one project or resource must win.
It asks Manitoba to put realistic alternatives on the same table and compare them fairly — water security, feedstock characteristics, processing requirements, capital and operating considerations, energy, transportation, infrastructure, environmental impacts, financing, downstream manufacturing and long-term benefit to Manitobans.
If SiMBA provides the stronger overall pathway, the evidence should demonstrate it. If another Manitoba resource or combination of resources provides a stronger pathway, the evidence should demonstrate that too.
The justification should be found in the evidence — not predetermined by the position we started with.
Manitoba should realistically and neutrally compare the available alternatives against the potential consequences of getting the decision wrong.
Where the security of drinking water is involved, no corporation, government or regulatory body can guarantee with absolute certainty that an unforeseen failure, pathway or consequence will never occur.
That does not mean development cannot proceed. It means the burden of comparison should be exceptionally high where another pathway may potentially deliver relatively comparable economic benefits while requiring less interaction with a critical groundwater resource.
With approximately 100,000 Manitobans relying on the aquifers identified in the provincial record, the question should not simply be whether a proposal can satisfy regulatory requirements.
The larger question is whether Manitoba has fully compared the available alternatives — and whether taking additional groundwater risk is necessary to achieve the economic objective at all.
That comparison becomes even more important where an alternative pathway is not merely theoretical.
Canadian Premium Sand provides a real Manitoba comparator with an established resource, Indigenous participation, provincial licensing associated with its Wanipigow and Selkirk development plans, and a proposed downstream manufacturing pathway.
That does not establish that CPS is the better alternative, nor does licensing establish that a project will ultimately be financed, constructed or commercially successful.
It does establish enough substance to justify a serious comparative examination.
The opportunity could extend beyond extraction. A successful downstream strategy involving Selkirk and potentially the Province of Manitoba could create employment, industrial activity, transportation demand and supply-chain opportunities whose benefits could ripple into Springfield and surrounding communities.
Where is the value actually created? Who finances the development? Where does the raw material go? Where is it processed? Who owns the downstream technology and manufacturing? What public infrastructure or incentives are required? Where are the jobs, taxes and long-term returns ultimately captured?
Manitoba's silica strategy should examine the whole value chain, not simply the value of material coming out of the ground.
Springfield residents have heard strong arguments surrounding Sio Silica and SiMBA. Those concerns deserve serious consideration.
But leadership also requires asking the next question:
Are there other ways Manitoba could pursue the economic opportunity while reducing potential risk, increasing value-added development and retaining more of the long-term benefit here at home?
The Missing Link examines that larger question without predetermining the answer.
If SiMBA provides the strongest overall pathway after water security, economics, processing, infrastructure, transportation and long-term public benefit are compared, the evidence should demonstrate it.
If another pathway provides comparable or greater economic benefit with less potential risk to drinking-water security, Manitobans deserve to know that too.
The Missing Link
Manitoba's Silica Strategy Deserves a Broader Discussion
Independent research and policy discussion • September 2026
📄 OPEN THE MISSING LINK — FULL REPORT PDF
Good government begins by listening.
You have my ear.
Together, let us roll up our sleeves.
It begins with your vote at the ballot box.